A typology of coaching, revisited — what is coaching (4a)?

As a follow-up to my attempt at a typology of coaching, I took a look at how CIMSPA — the Chartered Institute for the Management of Sport and Physical Activity — define the “Coach Practitioner”.

Coach Practitioners improve a participant’s experience of sport and physical activity by providing specialised support and guidance aligned to their individual needs.

CIMSPA

And that definition of a coach as someone who provides “specialised support and guidance aligned to their individual needs” pretty much nails it, for me.

Not explicitly technical, or tactical, or physical, or psychological — just “specialised support and guidance”, which could be “any of the above”, or something else, entirely.

The full definition of a Coach Practitioner, taken from the Membership application page, further emphasises the coaching environment over tech/tac/phys/psych interventions.

Coach Practitioners improve a participant’s experience of sport and physical activity by providing specialised support and guidance aligned to their individual needs.

  • You have an inspirational effect on individuals, groups and communities.
  • You lead the planning, preparation, delivery, continuous evaluation and review of a series of sport and/or physical activity sessions.
  • You ensure the culture and environment is designed to meet a participant’s welfare needs and allow them the opportunity to achieve their goals and meet their aspirations.
  • Your activity’s central focus is the participant’s development as a person.
  • You tailor and adapt to the participant’s needs whilst taking an inclusive approach.
  • You work with participants, other coaches, colleagues, volunteers, parents, teachers, youth workers and health professionals, to ensure the experience is the very best it can be.

Comments

One response to “A typology of coaching, revisited — what is coaching (4a)?”

  1. How do coaches learn to be better coaches? – The Teesra Avatar

    […] content (so you can be deemed “competent” whilst knowing next to nothing about cricket or coaching), dropping the UKCC accreditation because it imposed regulatory rigour and standards, dropping the […]

    Like

What do you think? Leave a reply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.