What do you want to change?

Interesting conversation with a couple of parents after our last coaching session before Christmas with one of their sons.

“My son annoys me so much – his grip is so low on the bat handle, and he won’t change it.”

[An acute, and accurate technical observation.]

– can he hit the ball?


– consistently, and with reasonable power?


– what do you want to change, then?

Published by Andrew Beaven

Cricket coach, fascinated by the possibilities offered by the game. More formally - ECB level 2 cricket coach; ECB National Programmes (All Stars & Dynamos Cricket) Activator Tutor; Chance to Shine & Team Up (cricket) deliverer; ECB ACO umpire.

Join the Conversation


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Wasn’t meant to be a ‘masterly understatement’, just a reflection of a group grapling with

    a) the redefinition of technique – is Bell a better ‘technical’ player than Butler or just more orthadox?
    and b) at what age / level of experience (if there is one) should we become more accepting of unorthadox / individual characteristics?

    I think b) is a toughie and Steff Jones talks about looking at players with idiosyncracies vs flaws which can be a pretty grey area at the margins

    1. This can be such a divisive topic – glad to hear the discussion was constructive.

      Re b) – has to accommodated from an early stage, I think, or the player will never develop his own technique – it must be very difficult to “unlearn” something, once it has been engrained over a period of years.

  2. Had an interesting discussion at the weekend at a county ECBCA ‘skills’ session on ‘method vs technique’. I think it would be fair to say there were a range of views within the group, perhaps a reflection of the fact that there were a number of experienced coaches in attendance who maybe have a slightly more flexible view of ‘technique’ anyway?

    1. “…a range of views within the group…” – masterly understatement, Tony?

      If we are now to define technique as…

      “Coordinated body movements (hips/shoulders/arms/hands) to enable clean contact with the ball”


      “Present[ation of the] full face of the bat to promote clean contact”

      …does it really matter how the bat is gripped?

%d bloggers like this: