The Teesra

Lock ‘em up — ‘video game design’ pt 2

Written by

Andrew Beaven

in

, , , , ,

In ‘lock ‘em up’, the batting team earn ‘upgrades’ (more open spaces to hit the ball into) by ‘locking’ fielders into disadvantageous fielding positions by successfully hitting the ball into designated target areas.

It is, in many respects, a gamified version of the old ‘Lord’s game’.  I have played it only with a front foot drive, but I can see no reason not to adapt it to for other attacking strokes.

This game has developed from an idea shared by @imsporticus , modified to include concepts from @davidhinchliffe and @ianren21 — thanks to all of my fellow coaches for the inspiration, and also to @AmyPrice_10 et al. for the theoretical underpinnings of sports coaching informed by digital game design.

Lock ’em up – how it works

Lock 'em upPlaying the game

Batters are challenged to drive the ball straight down the ground.

It might be best to have the coach feed the ball, or to allow a ‘co-operative feed’ from a teammate, to ensure that the batter receives deliveries that give him at least the chance to play a front foot drive.

Batters receive a set number of deliveries (3-6 seems to work, depending on the number of players in each team, and how patient they are whilst waiting their turn to bat).

Batters do not have to run every ball, but they score runs only by hitting the ball into the appropriate scoring zone (either restricted to the lock-up zones, or extended on either side) and running, and/or by clearing a boundary line, if there is an adequate space available.

Lock up

Hit the ball over the first target line (into the first lock-up zone (LUZ1), designated by cones), and the batting team get to ‘lock up’ a fielder – the fielder has to be “in the lock up’ (touching the designated cone) until the batter strikes the next delivery.

Hitting the ball beyond the second target line (LUZ2) locks up two fielders; beyond the third target line (LUZ3) and three fielders will be locked.

Fielders are locked until the next batter comes in OR for the duration of the team innings (so subsequent batters start with some locked fielders) — coach’s choice.

If a batter is bowled or caught out, all locked fielders are automatically released.

Other options

  • LUZs can be set closer to the batsman, or further away, depending on the batters’ ability to hit the target
  • If a batter is run out, they lose the ability to lock up fielders for the rest of their innings/for the next delivery
    • so that there is a consequence for poor running or good fielding [this suggested by the u11 players I tested this game with]
  • Batters in pairs
    • more representative; run outs at both ends [again, suggested by the u11 group]
  • Batters can score from shots hit outside the target area
    • depends on the number of fielders (more fielders could effectively block the LUZ, so batters might need more scope to score runs outside the LUZ), and the ability of the batsmen to hit into the designated LUZ.

 

Comments

4 responses to “Lock ‘em up — ‘video game design’ pt 2”

  1. Digital Video Games Approach: Cricket – drowningintheshallow Avatar
    Digital Video Games Approach: Cricket – drowningintheshallow

    […] Lock ‘em up — ‘video game design’ by Andrew Beaven […]

    Like

    Reply
  2. TonyM Avatar
    TonyM

    Andrew, as ever thanks for sharing your thoughts and experiences.

    Whilst I can see how Lock em up would work with younger age groups and can see the attraction of ‘locking up fielders’ but the benefit mainly accrues to teammates. Part of the attraction of ‘video game’ styles games is as the player progresses so the level of difficulty increases / scoring increases which is partly missing as the game currently stands so my tweak(s) would be something like:
    * change the scoring – I run something like this at present with ‘double’ runs scored for hitting in a designated scoring zone (set by me and/or the batter). Maybe for every shot through the scoring zone you score x times minus how many fielders?
    * another option – have 2 related scoring zones and allow the bowler initially to ‘protect’ as they see fit – batter then has the option of playing an ‘easier’ shot to the less protected area or a harder shot to the more heavily defended area. Rather than being locked up bowler has to defend both options and batter is measured by how many ‘successful’ shots in a round. For this I would have pretty large scoring zones to start with but it does bring in the idea of ‘manipulating the field’ but equally encourages bowlers to thing about and bowl to their field

    Thanks again
    Tony

    Like

    Reply
    1. Andrew Beaven Avatar
      Andrew Beaven

      Thanks for your thoughts, Tony.

      I have only just started with the video game design concept, and I do appreciate any feedback.

      I am hoping to work on a couple of summer camps in August, and I’ll be trying out ‘Lock ‘em up’ plus any tweaks (such as the ones you have suggested).

      In my game, the lock-ups (and the added space they create) is meant as a power-up rather than a higher level. And the fact that the benefit might accrue to a team mate might actually encourage players to work for the team.

      Like

      Reply
  3. “Knock ‘em down” & Lock ‘em up” — first attempts at ‘video game’ style activities – The Teesra Avatar
    “Knock ‘em down” & Lock ‘em up” — first attempts at ‘video game’ style activities – The Teesra

    […] I have settled on a couple of games that seem to meet some of the key criteria — I give you “Knock ‘em down” and “Lock ‘em up”. […]

    Like

    Reply

What do you think? Leave a reply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More posts